Cases 1 - 10 of 161
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
CHENG v. BENTON et al
as 2:2024cv06567
Plaintiff:
JIA CHENG
Defendant:
ROBERT BENTON, JOHN J. BROWN, HAO (KEVIN) CHEN and others
BUNTON v. CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv06382
Plaintiff:
DARREN W BUNTON
Defendant:
CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION and JOSE M. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
ESTATE OF DARBY PROCACCINI et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05375
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DARBY PROCACCINI and DARREN PROCACCINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOJKA KAZANCHY et al v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MOJKA KAZANCHY and BRIAN KAZANCHY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, GREG POFF, DARREN CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BRANCH, SR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
DARREN M. BRANCH, SR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HIGGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv23402
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., M. CHERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RAGO v. MERCER et al
as 2:2023cv20749
Plaintiff:
AL RAGO
Defendant:
DARREN MERCER, HAO (KEVIN) CHEN, DOZY MMOBUOSI and others
STEININGER v. GOLDBERG REALTY ASSOCIATES CO. et al
as 2:2023cv03437
Plaintiff:
DARREN STEININGER
Defendant:
GOLDBERG REALTY ASSOCIATES CO., JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and ABC CO. 1 THROUGH 10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
