Cases 1 - 10 of 42
(PS) Portnoy et al v. DeMore et al
as 2:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
Elena Portnoy and Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Charles H DeMore, Eduardo Aguirre, John Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kui Z Myles v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Kui Z Myles
Defendant:
Steven Lovett, Does 1 - 50, inclusive., David Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wise et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05942
Plaintiff:
Todd Wubbenhorst, Donna Kiewel, Valerie Esser and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novelty Textile Inc v. Mode Plus Inc et al
as 2:2015cv06653
Defendant:
2 Hearts, Inc., AA Fashion, Inc., CNA Textile Company and others
Plaintiff:
Novelty Textile Inc
Bowles v. Lemus et al
as 5:2013cv04730
Plaintiff:
John Bowles
Defendant:
Noel Lemus, Hugo Demoral , Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenzie and Okra Fabric Inc v. Broadway Textile Inc et al
as 2:2012cv06731
Defendant:
Chun Hui An, Angela Collection, Banabee Incorporation and others
Plaintiff:
McKenzie and Okra Fabric Inc
DeMore v. Law Offices of Harris & Zide et al
as 3:2010cv03085
Plaintiff:
Melanie DeMore
Defendant:
Law Offices of Harris & Zide and Frederick Hanna & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jia Xing Wang v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07332
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
