Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Green v. Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
as 5:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Warden F/N/U Cooper, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haithcote v. Woodard et al
as 4:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jeff W. Haithcote
Defendant:
f/n/u Peterson, Austin Swing, Mary West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haithcote v. Woodard et al
as 3:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jeff W. Haithcote
Defendant:
f/n/u Woodard, f/n/u Holloway, f/n/u Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. CCA-CEO-President et al
as 3:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
CCA-CEO-President, Micheal Corlew, Irean Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2016cv03299
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Terry Carter, Ms. (f/n/u) Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 14-6184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, KENYA BROWN, (F/N/U) COOPER, Unit Manager and others
Daniels v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Daniels
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Hunter, (f/n/u) Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2013mc00101
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Daniels
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Hunter, f/n/u Cooper and others
Hyde v. Leibach et al
as 3:2012cv00566
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Hyde
Defendant:
f/n/u Leibach, f/n/u Corlew, f/n/u Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde v. Leibach et al
as 3:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Hyde
Defendant:
f/n/u Leibach, f/n/u Taylor, f/n/u Corlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
