Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Yates v. Nouma
as 1:2024fp00234
Defendant:
Patrice Nouma
Plaintiff:
Jackie F. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griffin v. US Bankruptcy Court - KY, Judge et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Defendant:
James F. Guilfoyle, Dietz, Shields & Freeburger LLP, The Law Office of James Guilfoyle and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kennedy, Jr. v. Vickrey
as 1:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
David Vickrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kennedy, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and David Vickrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Albrecht v. Sternenberg et al
as 1:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Dana Albrecht
Defendant:
Kathleen Sternenberg, Bruce F. Dalpra, Julie A. Introcaso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ortiz Estupinan v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Jose F. Ortiz Estupinan
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hardrick v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael F Hardrick and Michael F. Hardrick
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Busch v. Stivali et al
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Busch
Defendant:
Peter Stivali, Alisha Wilson, Laynie Batchelder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
