Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Premier Claims, LLC v. Nola Healthcare, LLC
as 8:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Premier Claims, LLC
Defendant:
Nola Healthcare, LLC doing business as Wyndham Garden Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harshbarger v. Nemo Garden Vally
as 8:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard Harshbarger
Defendant:
Nemo Garden Vally
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harshbarger et al v. Neon Garden Valley MHP LLC.
as 8:2018cv00425
Plaintiff:
Richard Harshbarger and Teresa Harshbarger
Defendant:
Neon Garden Valley MHP LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Winfield Solutions, LLC v. Garden Fresh Vegetables, LLC
as 4:2014cv03037
Defaulted Defendant:
Garden Fresh Vegetables, LLC
Plaintiff:
Winfield Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
402) 475-1966 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Solis v. Zhang Garden, Inc.
as 8:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Zhang Garden, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanford v. Memberworks Incorporated et al
as 8:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sanford, Patricia Sanford, Patricia Sanford and others
Defendant:
Memberworks Incorporated, Memberworks Incorporated, Memberworks Incorporated and others
Movant:
West Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garden City Boxing Club v. Cortez et al
as 8:2007cv00360
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club
Defendant:
Antonio Cortez, Zoila Cortez and Guadalaja Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized reception of cable service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv05016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
