Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ENCHANTEDMOB, INC. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15548
Plaintiff: ENCHANTEDMOB, INC. and Mob Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Kpop Black Store, Minecraf888 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chen v. Garland
as 21-6645
Petitioner: BI HE CHEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shao Chen v. Attorney General United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3712
Petitioner: SHAO HE CHEN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08322
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Shuyi Zhou and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04856
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shao Chen v. Attorney General United State
as 15-3594
Petitioner: SHAO HE CHEN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chen, et al v. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1918
Petitioner: XIAO HE CHEN and LING YU LUO
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH
Chen v. O. RP
as 1:2015cv03533
Plaintiff: He Chen
Defendant: Karen O. RP and Karen Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chen, et al v. Holder
as 12-1753
Petitioner: XIAO HE CHEN and LING YU LUO
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Chen v. Holder
as 12-2245
Petitioner: Xin He Chen
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?