Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Howell, Jr. v. Simon et al
as 9:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Darra Simon, Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell, Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 9:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly, Jr., John D. Lackey II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lackey v. Saul
as 4:2021cv02751
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lackey
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Miller et al
as 5:2021cv00504
Defendant:
Amanda Lackey, Keri I. Miller and Paul Watkins
Plaintiff:
Robert Ellis Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Martin et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant:
NFN Martin, Blake Lackey, Crystal Rust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Washington et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Defendant:
Major FNU Castleberry, Monica Delavasco, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baez Cruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Killeen Police Department et al
as 6:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Officer FNU Asmus, Officer FNU Branson, Killeen Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Alvarez et al
as 5:2017cv00141
Defendant:
FNU Alvarez, Jack Hernandez and Sgt. FNU Velasquez
Plaintiff:
Ray Lackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Grats et al
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Willis Lackey
Defendant:
Andrew Grats, NFN Beech, NFN McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
