Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Brooke County Parks and Recreation Commission v. R & R Pools and Construction, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Brooke County Parks and Recreation Commission doing business as Brooke Hills Park Board
Defendant:
R & R Pools and Construction, Inc. and Larson Design Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Northeast Natural Energy LLC v. Larson Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00748
Defendant:
Kristi A. Rydberg, Valerie French, Marjorie Dahlgren and others
Plaintiff:
Northeast Natural Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Gray v. Larson
as 2:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Jason Larson
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW, Tobey Lynn Nutt, KAJ, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Larson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02716
Plaintiff:
Christine Larson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07085
Plaintiff:
Frances Larson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2016cv06497
Plaintiff:
Pennie Larson
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv16304
Plaintiff:
Ruth Larson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09587
Plaintiff:
Darylene Larson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04765
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Larson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
