Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Geter v. Chaves County Public Defenders et al
as 2:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Ruben Geter
Defendant:
Chaves County Public Defenders and Anna Marie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pistone v. State of New Mexico Public Defender Department et al
as 1:2013cv00920
Plaintiff:
Scott Pistone
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defender Department and T. David Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Salcido v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Vicente Salcido
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and New Mexico Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinmetz v. State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bryan James Steinmetz
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office , Hugh Dangler , T. David Eisenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
Harry Thomas
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, P. Bellgart and New Mexico Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Southwest Counseling Center, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold L. Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Southwest Counseling Center, Inc, Las Cruces Police Department, Dona Ana County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
