Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Ramirez Melgar v. Clearview SM, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03779
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez Melgar
Defendant:
Clearview SM, Inc. and Mojsi Marke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singh v. Singh et al
as 2:2020cv04919
Defendant:
RSM Property Group LLC, Raghbir Singh, SM Contractors Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jagir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Singh v. Singh et al
as 1:2020cv04919
Defendant:
RSM Property Group LLC, Raghbir Singh, SM Contractors Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jagir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gabelli Asset Fund et al v. Lu et al
as 1:2020cv08296
Plaintiff:
The Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, SM Investors II LP, The Gabelli Value 25 Fund Inc. and others
Defendant:
Courtney M. Enghauser, Carsten Reinhardt, Russell James and others
Petitioner:
Gamco Asset Management Inc.
SM Marketing International, LLC v. hibu, inc.
as 1:2020cv07727
Defendant:
hibu, inc.
Plaintiff:
SM Marketing International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
James v. State of New York et al
as 6:2020cv06718
Defendant:
Ms. SM (Mother) Gould, State of New York, Southport Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedoya v. NYC Citrus LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00548
Defendant:
NYC Citrus LLC, Squeeze My Oranges, Christopher Giangreco and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bedoya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burrell v. Oneida County et al
as 9:2019cv01629
Defendant:
SM Dental, Anthony Picente, Peter Rayhill and others
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv09671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
