Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Luker v. SMS Pipeline Services, LLC d/b/a Liberty Energy Services
as 5:2019cv00136
Defendant:
SMS Pipeline Services, LLC d/b/a Liberty Energy Services
Plaintiff:
Charles Luker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Alacritech Inc.
Defendant:
CenturyLink, Inc.
Consol_plaintiff:
Alacritech Inc.
Consol_defendant:
Wistron Corporation, Wiwynn Corporation, SMS Infocomm Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alacritech Inc. v. Wistron Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00692
Plaintiff:
Alacritech Inc.
Defendant:
Wistron Corporation, Wiwynn Corporation and SMS Infocomm Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMS Telecom LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
SMS Telecom LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
SMS Telecom LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
SMS Telecom LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
SMS Corp. v. Google, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00982
Plaintiff:
SMS Corp.
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MOSAID Technologies Incorporated v. Dell, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
MOSAID Technologies Incorporated
Defendant:
Dell, Inc. , Research In Motion Corporation , Research in Motion, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Coach, Inc. et al v. Cellular Planet et al
as 1:2010cv00697
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cellular Planet, SM Associates, LLC, Saeed Ahmed Memon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
v. SM Partners Dallas One, LLC
as 4:2008cv00230
Defendant:
SM Partners Dallas One, LLC, SMPD One, LP and Lauth Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Select Medical Corporation and Select Specialty Hospital - Dallas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
