Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Coke v. Retirement Systems of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Edward M Coke
Defendant:
Retirement Systems of Alabama, Director of Benefits Christopher Townes, Roy Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Alex Higdon v. Gail Tusan, et al
as 17-11127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX HIGDON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL S. TUSAN, KRYSTAL MOORE, BENSONETTA TIPTON-LANE and others
Alex Higdon v. Gail Tusan, et al
as 15-15597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX HIGDON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL S. TUSAN, KRYSTAL MOORE, BENSONETTA TIPTON-LANE and others
William McCavey v. Marsha Gold, et al
as 15-10613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. MCCAVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHA DEBRA GOLD, GARY MARKWELL & PC, GEORGIA LORD, Staff Attorney and others
Walker v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01532
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Walker , Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Moore et al
as 6:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Patrick A McCoy
Defendant:
James Moore, Chris McCool, Ira B Colvin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. City of Anniston Alabama
as 1:2012cv01999
Plaintiff:
Grace Ellis
Defendant:
City of Anniston Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puckett v. Willis et al
as 1:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Jeff Willis, Fred W Thompson, Clay County Sheriff's Department and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
