Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Corcoran v. Rivera et al
as 3:2010cv01025
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran and Vincent Rivera
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, John Palmer, John Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corcoran, Jr. v. Palmer et al
as 1:2010cv24021
Plaintiff:
William Corcoran, Jr.
Defendant:
John Palmer, C.G. Atkins, John Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. St. Clair et al
as 1:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Edward Francis Luevano
Defendant:
Jack St. Clair, Stephen Smith, Forester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. St. Clair et al
as 2:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Edward Francis Luevano
Defendant:
Jack St. Clair, Stephen Smith, Forester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv05600
Petitioner:
Stephen Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rivera et al v. Silcox et al
as 1:2009cv20703
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections, Ricky Silcox, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hughes v. Probation Officer et al
as 1:2008cv01330
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Hughes
Defendant:
Probation Officer, Stephen . Smith and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Woodroffe v. Oregon Department of Correctio, et al
as 08-35604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAX WILLIAMS, STEVE SHELTON and others
SNEED v MCDONOUGH
as 5:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE EUGENE SNEED
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, S M CULPEPPER, WHITFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAARBAY v. SMITH et al
as 3:2007cv00374
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SHAARBAY
Defendant:
STEPHEN SMITH, CYNTHIA COURTNEY, JENNIFER HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
