Cases 1 - 10 of 10,577
CLUNEY v. BROWNELLS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BILLI-JO CLUNEY
Defendant:
BROWNELLS INC, MDX CORP and FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
WHITTEMORE v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WHITTEMORE
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METHUSELAH TREE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
METHUSELAH TREE LLC, ROBERT ROSS, RLR ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
US BANK TRUST NA v. PLOURDE
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA
Defendant:
FRANCES L PLOURDE
Interested Party:
INFINITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAVIS v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC v. IRELAND
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC
Defendant:
KEVEN IRELAND
ECOMAINE INC v. POWER SERVICES GROUP INC
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
ECOMAINE INC
Defendant:
POWER SERVICES GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
