Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02936
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Qian Zhao, et al v. Robert Adams, et al
as 10-60312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QIAN ZHAO, SHIRAZ SYED QAZI, SALEEMULLAH SHERISS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT ADAMS, Warden of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility in Mississippi and KENNETH LANDGREBE, Field Office Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wilson et al v. Lacy et al
as 4:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Waqas Wilson, Adil Mohammad, Biniam Tekle Abraha and others
Defendant:
Robert Lacy, Kenneth Landgrebe, John Doe 1 to 50 and others
Movant:
Fazal Karim, Francisco J Espinosa, Rufino Revercio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-60023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhao et al v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv04133
Plaintiff:
Qian Ibrahim Zhao, Shiraz Syed Qazi, Saleemullah Sheriss and others
Defendant:
Robert Adams and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Qazi v. Mukasey
as 08-60262
Petitioner:
SHIRAZ SYED QAZI
Respondent:
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Qazi v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv00913
Petitioner:
Shiraz Syed Qazi
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
