Cases 1 - 10 of 11,301
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLANCHARD v. HEGG et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Lavara Blanchard
Defendant:
Ron Hegg and A Hahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Lott
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borders v. Lafayett Police Deportment The et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Borders
Defendant:
Lafayett Police Deportment The, Ian O'Shields and Robison
Not Yet Classified:
BRANCHVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. South Bend Parole District #8 et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Burton
Defendant:
South Bend Parole District #8, Redding and Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wayne Fox
Defendant:
Cathy Collins, Candace Johnston, Caleb Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
