Cases 41 - 50 of 426,534
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shonn L Miller
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
WATSON v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY CODY REESE and PROBATION OFFICER KEN STAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA, BEAVER COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
OSIECKI et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
DIANA FAITH OSIECKI and STEVEN OSIECKI
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
