Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11331
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Nails v. Midland City Housing Authority et al
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Midland City Housing Authority, Kelly Fitzgerald Pate and Ray T. Kennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Nails v. Napier Field Police Department, et al
as 23-10473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAPIER FIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR NAPIER FIELD and others
Angela Nails v. Savannah Police Department, et al
as 23-10088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER STRIVE
Angela Nails v. St. Joseph Candler Hospital, et al
as 22-14296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. JOSEPH CANDLER HOSPITAL and DAJAUNIA JAMES
Nails v. Dale County Sheriff Department et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Dale County Sheriff Department, Willie Olsan, Barann Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Nails v. Mal Ortega
as 22-13812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
MAL ORTEGA
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 22-12718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Angela Nails v. Hazel Park, MI Police Department, et al
as 22-1548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAZEL PARK, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MORRIS, OFFICER WESTENBENG and others
Angela Nails v. Edward Zeienak
as 22-1537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD M. ZEIENAK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
