Cases 11 - 20 of 120
LaVan Yankton, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 14-60515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVAN YANKTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, EARNEST LEE and others
Ollie Evans v. Ronal Woodall, et al
as 14-60307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONAL WOODALL, DOCTOR CHARMAN MCCLEAVE, RON KING, Superintendent and others
Jamie Roberson v. Emmitt Sparkman
as 14-60237
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMIE ROBERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN
Melissa Webster v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 14-60202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA ELAINE WEBSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, JAMES HOLMAN, Superintendent and others
Yankton v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
LaVan Yankton, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 14-60102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, Official position and Commissioner, MRS. ANITA JOHNSON, MRS. UNKNOWN WASHINGTON, Official position and others
Baldwin v. Abston et al
as 3:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darnell Baldwin
Defendant:
David Abston, Keith Cox, John McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. Emmitt Sparkman, et al
as 14-60071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and TIMOTHY MORRIS
Ollie Evans v. Blackwell, et al
as 14-60063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. BLACKWELL, ROBERT CHAD, PAT MARLOR and others
Ollie Evans v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 14-60015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, also known as John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
