Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Rodriguez v. Anastacio
as 1:2022cv04245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, D. Gomez, Sgt. Anastacio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubertin v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Maurice Aubertin
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Anastacio Perez, Michael Moriarity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Nutter, et al v. The Ohio State University
as 21-3982
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS NUTTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC SMITH, MARK COLEMAN, WILLIAM KNIGHT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Granillo v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Granillo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Anastacio Ramirez v. Scott Frauenheim
as 21-55770
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANASTACIO G. RAMIREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden
DAYOT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26599
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY ANASTACIO DAYOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribe to Certificate No. IRPI-SB-18-00029 v. Markey et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Linea Azul, Innovia Films American, Inc., Alberto Riojas and others
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Who Subscribe to Certificate No. IRPI-SB-18-029
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joel Ambrosio-Anastacio v. Merrick Garland
as 21-71044
Petitioner:
JOEL AMBROSIO-ANASTACIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Isaias Tzul v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70645
Petitioner:
ISAIAS ANASTACIO TZUL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mejias v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv20399
Defendant:
Dr. Jade Anastacio, NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. and Dr. Maria Guerlain Lee
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mejias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
