Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Batiste v. BP Deepwater Horizon et al
as 2:2016cv15254
Plaintiff:
Leoutha Batiste
Defendant:
BP Deepwater Horizon, Halliburton and Transocean
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McBride v. BP Deepwater Horizon et al
as 2:2016cv15255
Plaintiff:
Rico McBride
Defendant:
BP Deepwater Horizon, Halliburton and Transocean
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McBride v. BP Deepwater Horizon et al
as 2:2016cv15250
Plaintiff:
Blondine McBride
Defendant:
BP Deepwater Horizon, Halliburton and Transocean
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In Re: Oil Spill by th Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
as 5:2016mc00017
Defendant:
Oil Spill by th Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
In Re:
In Re: Oil Spill by th Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
as 2:2016ms00063
Plaintiff:
In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"
In Re: Deepwater Horizon
as 16-30918
Defendant - Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INCORPORATED, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and BP, P.L.C.
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
In Re: Deepwater Horizon
as 16-30717
Appellee:
LOUIS J. FREEH, Special Master
Claimant - Appellant:
CRYSTAL SEAFOOD COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DWH Claimant 100100245
Movant - Appellee:
PATRICK A. JUNEAU, In His Capacity as Claims Administrator and Trustee
Mason v. IN RE: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in Gulf of Mexico
as 2:2016cv10855
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mason
Defendant:
Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McBride v. Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon
as 2:2016cv06635
Plaintiff:
Richard McBride
Defendant:
Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In Re: Deepwater Horizon
as 16-30547
Defendant - Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INCORPORATED, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and BP, P.L.C.
Claimant - Appellant:
KEVIN S. SMITH, SOLOMON J. FLEISCHMAN and JOHN C. KELLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
