Cases 1 - 10 of 943
EXCELLUS HEALTH PLAN, INC. d/b/a EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD v. BLACKFLY INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a MOLECULAR TESTING LABS
as 6:2024cv06263
Plaintiff:
EXCELLUS HEALTH PLAN, INC. d/b/a EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD
Defendant:
BLACKFLY INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a MOLECULAR TESTING LABS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
English v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Kristin English
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
Valdez v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Amy Valdez
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Newman v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 8:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Patrick Eric Newman
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Feeley-Welch v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Vickie Feeley-Welch
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Roberson v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Sandra Roberson
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hernandez v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Marisol Hernandez
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP, John Doe and John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.171.39.165
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wicklow v. ALRKUSH, LLC
as 0:2024cv60297
Plaintiff:
Angela Wicklow
Defendant:
ALRKUSH, LLC doing business as Sharkey's Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daramis Sharkey v. James Holloway
as 24-5145
Petitioner:
DARAMIS LEE SHARKEY
Respondent:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
