Cases 1 - 10 of 2,526
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Soscia Holdings, LLC v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1397
Plaintiff:
SOSCIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, TERENCE GRAY, individually and in his capacity as the Director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and others
Interested Party:
STEVEN J. RILEY
Wright v. Nessinger
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL NESSINGER, Warden, Wyatt Detention Facility
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Tempest v. State of RI Office of the Attorney General
as 24-1199
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D. TEMPEST
Defendant:
RONALD PENNINGTON, Woonsocket Police Department Sergeant, in his individual and Official Capacity, RODNEY C. REMBLAD, Woonsocket Police Department Chief of Police, in his individual and Official Capacity and WOONSOCKET, RI, by and through its Treasurer Laurie Perry
Cross Defendant:
RI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Howell v. Watertown Public Library, et al
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
WATERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY and WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
