Cases 31 - 40 of 247
DRAZDIK V DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL
as 2:2020cv00549
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STEPHEN DRAZDIK, JR.
Defendant:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE BUREAU, DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
as 2:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN STONE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KOCSIS v. ANTHIUM, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KOCSIS
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, ANTHIUM, LLC, CAM LOAN SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PITTS et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Plaintiff:
MR. KORRY PITTS, MRS. KIMBERLEY PITTS and 412 MOTORING, LLC
Defendant:
SEAN CONROY, GARY NORRIS, CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. PINAULT
as 2:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
ASIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
FRANCOIS PINAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caple v. PA General Assembly et al
as 1:2019cv01435
Defendant:
KeyBank, PNC Bank and PA General Assembly
Plaintiff:
Glen Daniel Caple
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
BANK OF NEW YORK v. FAZIO et al
as 2:2019cv03907
Defendant:
ROBERT BRUCE FAZIO and UPPER INDIAN HEAD ROAD DEVELOPMENT, LLC, REAL OWNER
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SAVITZ v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 2:2019cv00873
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SAVITZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
NEILSON v. SHAPIRO AND DENARDO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02808
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY NEILSON
Defendant:
SHAPIRO AND DENARDO, LLC and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461
PALARDY et al v. SHAPIRO & DENARDO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01338
Defendant:
SHAPIRO & DENARDO, LLC and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELLEN T. PALARDY and RICHARD A. PALARDY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
