Cases 1 - 10 of 18,486
WILLIAMS et al v. RUTALA et al
as 2:2024cv02132
Plaintiff:
OSCEOLA WILLIAMS, SUSIE CARTER and OSCEOLA PERDUE
Defendant:
JOSEPH RUTALA, MARK S. HALPERN and DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tenney v. Edger et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Sherry Tenney
Defendant:
Paul Edger, Mia Paone, Sarah Frasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TRI-STATE DELIVERY, INC. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
TRI-STATE DELIVERY, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDAWAY v. WARBY PARKER-SUBURBAN SQUARE
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
WARBY PARKER-SUBURBAN SQUARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ettorre v. York County et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Elaine Ettorre
Defendant:
York County, David L. Lash, Erika Eiker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey-Baker v. PASQUARELLI et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bailey-Baker
Defendant:
PASQUARELLI and sarver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALTON v. MCCARTHY et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WALTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCARTHY, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-3 and POLICE SERGEANT JOHN DOE NO. 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hairston v. Williamsport Police Department
as 4:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Antwan Hairston
Defendant:
Williamsport Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
