Cases 1 - 10 of 1,646
NASH, JR. v. SOHO STUDIO, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv06016
Plaintiff:
LARRY NASH, JR.
Defendant:
SOHO STUDIO, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
PORRECA v. HYBRIDGE LEARNING GROUP LLC
as 3:2024cv06011
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PORRECA
Defendant:
HYBRIDGE LEARNING GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GIANNATTASIO v. AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05854
Plaintiff:
TARRA GIANNATTASIO
Defendant:
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-5) and ABC CORP (6-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GIAGNACOVA v. 21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
NANCY GIAGNACOVA
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL and Dr. Matthew Flannery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SOLTYSIAK v. PENN STAINLESS PRODUCTS, INC.
as 5:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
ANITA SOLTYSIAK
Defendant:
PENN STAINLESS PRODUCTS, INC.
CALLAHAN v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. (FORMERLY PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS COMPANY) et al
as 1:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CALLAHAN, JR.
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. (FORMERLY PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS COMPANY), PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC., PAUL KUSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
CHAMBERS v. CANAM STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv02682
Plaintiff:
NOEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
CANAM STEEL CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CHANDLER v. QUICKCHEK CORPORATION
as 3:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHANDLER
Defendant:
QUICKCHEK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
HYMER v. ASSEM-PAK CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
HEATHER HYMER
Defendant:
ASSEM-PAK CORPORATION, DWK LIFE SCIENCES LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
