Cases 31 - 40 of 1,170
ENTY v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2023cv04651
Plaintiff:
KYLE R. ENTY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., TANISHA BEY and KRISTEN ABNEY
ABOUELMAKAREM v. MUSTAFA et al
as 2:2023cv22209
Plaintiff:
NADER ABOUELMAKAREM
Defendant:
MAHMOUD MUSTAFA and SADIYA MUSTAFA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PODLUCKY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY and KARLA SUE PODLUCKY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Grajales-El v. Ardry
as 1:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
Henry Grajales-El
Defendant:
Tristan Michael Ardry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LEONARD v. BAYUK et al
as 3:2023cv21314
In Re:
PAUL A. MORABITO
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. LEONARD, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD BAYUK and MAXTMAX LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Schore et al v. McConnell
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schore and Elliot Schore
Defendant:
Raymond McConnell, Raymond H. McConnell and The Heirs of Lillian McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Cooper
as 1:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dana Cooper doing business as Cooper Masonry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Papapietro v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2022cv01624
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Ocwen Loan Servicing and Wilmington Finance, The Bank of New York as Successor in Interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papapietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
MCGUIGAN v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2023cv04258
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P MCGUIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
