Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 51,601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner: Donald Charles Carty
Respondent: Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rockwell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rockwell
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff: Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant: Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner: Jesse Carey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rayner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff: Audrey Rayner
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Purity and Grace Inc. v. Therrien
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Purity and Grace Inc.
Defendant: John Therrien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner: Jorge Chavez
Respondent: Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff: Ronald Stockton
Defendant: Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?