Cases 1 - 10 of 2,330
Aubrey v. Radial, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerad Aubrey
Defendant:
Radial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Louks v. Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11233
Plaintiff:
Shana Louks
Defendant:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wheeling v. City of Winchester
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wheeling
Defendant:
City of Winchester
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rhoda v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robertta Rhoda
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Wimsatt v. Petro Towery, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Erik Wimsatt
Defendant:
Petro Towery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henton v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Danielle Henton
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Crystal D. Murphy and Michael Peeples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Burgess v. The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11100
Plaintiff:
Summer Burgess
Defendant:
The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Thompson v. A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thompson
Defendant:
A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
