Cases 21 - 30 of 2,586
Martin v. Lotic.ai, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Martin
Defendant:
Lotic.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fournier v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
as 2:2024cv10355
Plaintiff:
Sara Fournier
Defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. d/b/a Deltar Fasteners, NA and Illinois Tool Works, Inc. Doing business as Deltar Fasteners, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
City of Pontiac v. City of Pontiac VEBA Board of Trustees
as 2:2024cv10287
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac and Pontiac, City of
Defendant:
City of Pontiac VEBA Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Floyd, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jiles K. Floyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fortin v. Optalis Management Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fortin
Defendant:
Optalis Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Boyken v. Kentucky Dream Homes, LLC
as 4:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Morgan Boyken
Defendant:
Kentucky Dream Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kelmendi v. Michigan Office of Retirement Services et al
as 2:2023cv13172
Plaintiff:
John Kelmendi
Defendant:
Michigan Office of Retirement Services, Detroit Board of Education, Detroit Public Schools and others
Quarm v. FPC International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10044
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Quarm
Defendant:
FPC International, Inc. and Fedchem LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Grainger et al
as 2:2023cv12991
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richard Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Grainger, Wayne County Jury Commission, Community Care and others
Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLC
as 3:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Julie Kay Clark
Defendant:
VIP PetCare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.