Cases 101 - 110 of 12,990
Shenzhen Yihong Technology Co., Ltd. v. InterDesign, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Yihong Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Vtopmart
Defendant:
InterDesign, Inc. doing business as iDesign
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Applied Concepts, Inc. v. MPH Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Applied Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
MPH Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Archie et al v. Pitch Black Seal Coat, LLC
as 2:2024cv11017
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Archie and U.S. Seal International, Inc.
Defendant:
Pitch Black Seal Coat, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc. v. Xpress Care Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11000
Plaintiff:
New Mo-Town Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Xpress Care Pharmacy, LLC and Cliffside Medical Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
