Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 41 - 50 of 124,511
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff: Jimmie Baugh
Defendant: Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11180
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hubble v. Loandepot.com, LLC
as 1:2024cv11173
Plaintiff: Robert Hubble
Defendant: Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carpenter v. King et al
as 2:2024cv11176
Petitioner: Carli Carpenter
Respondent: C. King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Stead v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11183
Petitioner: Michael Stead
Respondent: Warden John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?