Cases 41 - 50 of 10,838
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Caroline M. Meyer
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Proctor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Nichole Proctor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Greer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jerome Greer
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Aujua S. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SMITHEY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
JAMIE NICOLE SMITHEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suprise v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M Suprise
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reedy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
LaShonda H Reedy
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chambers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jerjuana S. Chambers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RALPH JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. RALPH JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
