Cases 1 - 10 of 6,746
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Modzelewski v. Craymer
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sally Modzelewski
Defendant:
Gideon Craymer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vowels v. USPS OIG et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
USPS OIG, The State of Kentucky: Kentucky Secretary of State, KY Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
O'Hara v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Steven F. O'Hara
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense, United States Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Musgrove v. USA
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gwen Musgrove
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gerstle v. Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Zoe Gerstle
Defendant:
Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, Sherrell Clay and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
