Cases 1 - 10 of 4,231
D'Amario v. Sturdy et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Mark E. Sturdy and Kyle P Heagney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams et al v. O'Brien at al
as 1:2024cv11161
Plaintiff:
Charles P Williams and Valencia Williams
Defendant:
Paul O'Brien, Town of Hanson, Michael Miksch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ritrovato v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2024cv11166
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Nicholas A Ritrovato, III
Defendant:
Michael L Fitzgerald and Paul Rodriques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter Jr v. Commonwealth of MA District & Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv40068
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter Jr
Defendant:
Commonwealth of MA District & Superior Court, Worcester Superior Court, Malden District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kolackovsky et al v. Town of Rockport
as 1:2024cv11139
Plaintiff:
Mr. John T. Kolackovsky, Mr. Zenas B. Seppala, Ms. Anne Hyde and others
Defendant:
Town of Rockport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ryan v. McCullough et al
as 1:2024cv11111
Plaintiff:
Tara Ryan
Defendant:
Catherine McCullough and Needham, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaRoe v. Twomey et al
as 3:2024cv30059
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Kelly LaRoe
Defendant:
Paula Twomey, Jefferey Riley, Bureau of Special Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parlon v. Hamel
as 1:2024cv10453
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
Craig Hamel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasan v. ECFMG et al
as 1:2024cv10438
Plaintiff:
Dr. Prof Syed MK Hasan
Defendant:
ECFMG, Francine Katz, Katherin Oleyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kersey v. My Job Mobile
as 1:2024cv11081
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
My Job Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
