Cases 11 - 20 of 18,547
Carlock v. City of Harper Woods et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11126
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller, The City of Detroit and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pogue v. Oakland University et al
as 2:2024cv11134
Plaintiff:
Eric Pogue
Defendant:
Oakland University and Ashley Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Miles v. Wayne County Treasurer et al
as 2:2024cv11125
Plaintiff:
Charles Miles
Defendant:
Wayne County Treasurer and Detroit Treasurer Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dancz et al v. Lake, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Linda Dancz, Suzanne Eggers, Carla Hartwick and others
Defendant:
Lake, County of, Kellie Allen and Brenda L. Kutchinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
