Cases 21 - 30 of 58,496
Bryant v. Limestone County, Texas
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tometheus Bryant
Defendant:
Limestone County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. David George Hillburn et al
as 4:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bernard Poole
Defendant:
David George Hillburn, Kevin W. Capps and Tiffany Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Warden Washington et al
as 4:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden Washington and O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumumbavalier v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Nkrumeh Lumumbavalier
Defendant:
The State of Texas and Kim K. Ogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Grieve et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
FNU Grieve and J Leet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Texas City Police Officer et al
as 4:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
Texas City Police Oficer and Texas City Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Respondent:
County of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
