Cases 1 - 10 of 3,432
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Cestui Que Trust
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Craig Bernard Wilder
Defendant:
Cestui Que Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ladner et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Ladner, Taylor Igleheart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Officer J. Jackson, Special Agent Devito and John or Jane Doe Officers or Agents #1 to #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ketcher v. White et al
as 5:2024cv05090
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Ketcher
Defendant:
Deputy White and Deputy Venasula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooperwood v. Tripp
as 4:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cooperwood
Defendant:
Arden Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalek v. Rockport, City of et al
as 6:2024cv06053
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Beischl Michalek
Defendant:
Rockport, City of and Malvern Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
