Cases 41 - 50 of 14,411
White v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02087
Petitioner:
Patrick White
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Lemont Jerrone Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 5:2024hc02086
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez and Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
Joshua H. Stein, Jamie Bullard and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner:
Shurod Rankin
Respondent:
Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
