Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,751
Lindsey v. Jones et al.
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: Aaron Lindsey
Defendant: Officer Jones and Jane/John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner: Michael L. Larr
Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: Justin Goins
Defendant: Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner: Anthony Belton
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: Michael Dunn
Defendant: Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner: James C Miller
Defendant: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff: EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant: Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff: Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant: Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sanders v. USA
as 1:2024cv00191
Petitioner: Deon Sanders
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?