Cases 41 - 50 of 5,937
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stout v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Stout
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smallwood v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carl Smallwood
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Timothy Tibbs and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael William Hawkins
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail and Captain Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaber v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
Warden Ray, Acting Warden Brown, Officer Titlle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bray v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Reginald Bray
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
