Cases 31 - 40 of 3,616
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Stephen Lush
Respondent:
Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayberry, Bobby v. Kaul, Josh
as 3:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Bobby F. Mayberry, Jr.
Respondent:
Josh Kaul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez, Ted v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Ted Lopez
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. DeHann
as 2:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Pierre Gardner and Pierre Douglas Gardner
Respondent:
Sue DeHann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hineman v. Gierach
as 2:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Hineman
Respondent:
Michael Gireach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greer v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
Marvin Greer
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
