Cases 31 - 40 of 1,648
JOHNSON v. NAVISITE LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04043
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Defendant:
NAVISITE LLC and JOHN 1-5 AND 6-10 DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
WILSON v. CARVANA, LLC
as 1:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL M WILSON
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 5:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
BAUTISTA v. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES - SAINT MICHAEL'S LLC
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
DEANNA BAUTISTA
Defendant:
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES - SAINT MICHAEL'S LLC doing business as SAINT MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 2:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
PAYNE v. TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
HARRIS PAYNE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
FRAGNITO v. KEURIG DR PEPPER et al
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
VINCENT FRAGNITO
Defendant:
KEURIG DR PEPPER, BRITTANY WILLIAMS and BRIAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
RIVERS III v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
LOUIS N. RIVERS III
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. and WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. doing business as SAMS CLUB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
URBAN v. SOUTH JERSEY GAS et al
as 1:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW URBAN
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY GAS, SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, LISA OTOOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ramadan v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ramadan
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
