Cases 91 - 100 of 691
Howell v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Reverand Wesley Howell
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom, Paul Bach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HASARA v. BUCHANNON et al
as 1:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Brendon Hasara
Defendant:
Kim Buchannon, Nikki Hollywood, Karina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLAWSON et al
as 3:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
Deshon A.R. Smith
Defendant:
C/O1 Clawson, C/O1 Whitney, C/O1 Lawrnce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Kramer et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
R. Kramer, J. Carter, J. Smolke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Weller et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Defendant:
A. Weller, CO2 Powers, Z. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GARDNER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Darryl Gardner
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, GEORGE M. LITTLE and Tanya Heist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLEESE v. COGNETTI et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Quinton M. Mccleese
Defendant:
Paige Cognetti, William Shanley, Lackawanna County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOROKAPUT v. BONNER et al
as 4:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Peter Sorokaput
Defendant:
James Bonner, Schuylkill County Prison and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart-Richardson v. Conelly et al
as 1:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Corey Stewart-Richardson
Defendant:
Lt. Conelly, C.O. Tucker Frey, C.O. Grim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toole v. Rivello et al
as 1:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Claude Toole
Defendant:
J. Rivello, J. Kohler and S. Grassmyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
