Cases 91 - 100 of 348,697
Riles v. City of Fremont et al
as 3:2024cv02986
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Riles
Defendant:
City of Fremont and Christopher Borzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Christian Rivera
Defendant:
County of San Diego, John Wright and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loflin et al v. Huntington Beach City of et al
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Paul Loflin, Jr.
Other:
Estate of Trevor Loflin
Defendant:
Huntington Beach City of and DOES 1 though 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BLACK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Plaintiff:
DONNA A. BLACK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LEWIS D. FEREBEE, GEORGE GREENHOW and others
PRUDHOMME v. MICHLES et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant:
MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH, ADRIAN BRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker et al v. Citigroup Inc., d/b/a Citibank et al
as 0:2024cv60834
Plaintiff:
Werner Jack Becker and Dana Guida
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., d/b/a Citibank and Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hesser v. Becraft Jr.
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Peter Hesser
Defendant:
Lowel H. Becraft Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Claud v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Roland Claud
Defendant:
Paul Howard and Greg L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Holsten Management Corp
as 1:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Chong Ho Su
Defendant:
Holsten Management Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
