Cases 91 - 100 of 159
Taylor v. Arch Coal, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kenny Taylor
Defendant:
ICG Tygart Valley, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Powers v. Covestro LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05253
Defendant:
Bayer Material Science, LLC, Covestro LLC, Bayer Corporation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Powers and Martin Powers
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Mills v. City of Huntington
as 3:2017cv03622
Plaintiff:
Mark Mills
Defendant:
City of Huntington
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Harvey v. Interstate Realty Management Company
as 3:2017cv03415
Plaintiff:
Greg Harvey
Defendant:
Interstate Realty Management Company
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Wamsley et al v. U.S. Well Services, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas S. Wamsley and Meredith Wamsley
Defendant:
U.S. Well Services, LLC and Charlie Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Revis v. Cellco Partnership
as 2:2017cv03183
Plaintiff:
William Revis
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Adams v. Groves et al
as 2:2017cv03127
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Garry Groves, Greenbrier Minerals, LLC, Cliff's Logan County Coal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Toney v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 3:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
Danielle Toney
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Whitt v. High Voltage, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02532
Plaintiff:
Fred Whitt
Defendant:
High Voltage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Cumpston v. Central Supply Company of West Virginia et al
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cumpston
Defendant:
Central Supply Company of West Virginia and Patrick Scott Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
