Cases 101 - 110 of 1,995
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McDaniel v. Preserve Property Management Company, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Alison McDaniel
Defendant:
Preserve Property Management Company, LLC and Paul Mihailides
Counter Claimant:
The Preserve at Boulder Hills, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rhode Island Association of Coastal Taxpayers v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Rhode Island Association of Coastal Taxpayers
Defendant:
Peter Neronha, Jeffrey Willis and Terrence Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Logan et al v. Antaya et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Logan and Ephraim E. Logan
Defendant:
Heather Antaya and Lynne Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. McConnell
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge John J. McConnell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Withers v. Judge Darigan
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge Darigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. Judge McHugh
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
