Cases 101 - 110 of 31,127
Arkel International, LLC v. San Juan Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Arkel International, LLC
Defendant:
San Juan Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hampel v. Virgin Orbit Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00328
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Coleman v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Devin L. Coleman
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill-Swinson et al v. Beck et al
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Lena Hill-Swinson and Jacquelyn Hill-Swinson
Defendant:
Joshua M. Beck, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Roy v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Rashid Jamil Roy
Defendant:
Terra Taylor, Bruce Burton, Aaron Jelliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Shalk et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cotton
Defendant:
Jennifer Shalk, Doe 1 and Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. NuStar Energy L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
NuStar Energy L.P., Bradley Barron, J. Dan Bates and others
Smith v. Fattouh et al
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Louis Smith
Defendant:
Ahmed M. Fattouh, Brandon Bentley, Jeffrey Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Folks v. Howard R. Young Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Folks
Defendant:
Howard R. Young Correctional Institution and R. Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
