Cases 101 - 110 of 18,494
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brotzman v. Posey
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
John Brotzman
Defendant:
Argil Posey, II and Nicolas Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINDSHEIMER et al v. WEST HOMESTEAD BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
LEXIS WINDSHEIMER and KAYONA SMART
Defendant:
WEST HOMESTEAD BOROUGH, WEST HOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES ROZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairweather v. Spathelf, et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Fairweather
Defendant:
Spatoff, Thomas J. McDonald, Michael J. Ossont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABONTE v. HENRY et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. HENRY and CHRISTOPHER L. PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LILLIOCK v. WALTZ et al
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
KEITH LILLIOCK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WALTZ, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GBOHUNMI et al v. MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
as 2:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
ALAKE GBOHUNMI and STEPHANIE KEENE
Defendant:
MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greenfield v. The City of Scranton
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Larry Greenfield
Defendant:
The City of Scranton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
