Cases 101 - 110 of 10,171
Reed Day, et al v. Ben Henry, et al
as 23-16148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REED DAY and ALBERT JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee:
BEN HENRY, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, TROY CAMPBELL, Chair, Arizona State Liquor Board, in their official capacities and KRIS MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35593
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lowell Robinson, Jr. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 23-16071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL ROBINSON, Jr., Master Sergeant USMC, Retired
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LEANDRO GUILLEN, Loan Advisor, JOYA LEWIS, Loan Associate and others
Bahig Saliba v. American Airlines Incorporated
as 23-16070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHIG SALIBA
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Crossett v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. CROSSETT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DETECTIVE ASHLEY HAGEMAN-TURNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
